India鈥檚 opposition leader has recently floated聽minimum income support. The 1.5% GDP equivalent it requires can be financed through a 3% tax on the richest 3000. It is not just an idealized safety net for the poor 鈥� it has been done before, for the super elites. If it works, it can be a model for adoption in other emerging democracies. Read More »
Author: Rishabh Kumar
Not just r > g but r + q >> g: Piketty meets Ricardo in the long run of Indian history
Wealth-income ratios are rising everywhere 鈥� they are not cyclical but rather unambiguously upward trending for the past three decades. Put simply, the accumulation of wealth is outpacing economic growth. This is true in America, Europe and Japan (Piketty and Zucman 2014), as well as China and Russia (Novokmet, Zucman & Yang 2018). , I found this same trend to persist in the world鈥檚 largest democracy – Indian wealth-income ratios have been rising since the 1970s. Why are these trends so similar in countries with such deep structural differences and distinct economic trajectories? By themselves, high wealth-income ratios are not necessarily a social dilemma 鈥� they may imply more wealth for everyone. But in general, there is a tendency for wealth to be more concentrated than income. As a result, a rise in wealth over income tends to increase wealth inequality. in most economies today. Thus, these trends and the mechanisms behind them need to be understood with careful attention.
The long run evolution of the rich in India 1937-2012
Inequality in India may be returning to levels last seen during British Rule. To understand this, it is necessary to put India鈥檚 elite at the center of macro-history.
One of the central questions in political economy is how wealth evolves, particularly at the top. In Europe and the USA, we now accept that progression of wealth inequality followed a 鈥淯鈥� shape or what has been called the 鈥淚nverted Kuznets Curve.鈥� Briefly put, on the eve of World War I, the richest few percentiles dominated Western society with their massive wealth holdings. Fast forward to a decade after World War II and we see that their wealth declined substantially, but then started rising again in the late 1970s. Much has been written on this since (and due to) the publication of Piketty鈥檚 (2014) . My new and revised paper () puts the rich at the center of India鈥檚 economic history over the last eight decades. The main question I want to ask is the following: Is the state of contemporary wealth concentration in India a continuation or a break from its history?Read More »
What do we know about the wealthy in India? A case study prior to liberalization
The first modern book in economics was called the 鈥淲ealth of Nations鈥� because its writer, Adam Smith understood (and transmuted the idea) that the key to prosperity and growth was the generation and distribution of wealth – not just the flow of income. Recent interest in economics has started to return to this question especially in the context of today鈥檚 rich countries. The academic attention on the metamorphosis and concentration of wealth has so far excluded poor countries. In fact the study of the wealth of poor nations should be a core question in development economics (over income growth) because wealth tends to cumulate all past prosperity or disparity.
I found it notable that despite the detailed historical analysis in Piketty鈥檚 book , there was no mention of Indian wealth (Piketty did study top Indian incomes). To an extent this is understandable because data on India is so limited and unreliable that documenting it would require a book in itself. Till date, the Indian central bank (RBI) does not follow the tradition of publishing regular household and private sector balance sheets at market value, to assess accumulation and asset prices. And yet due to its sheer size and importance, India presents a unique challenge to the notion of prosperity – it is simultaneously home to some of the and global citizens. In the past, the question of India鈥檚 colonial subservience was related to the , rather than income – the British enriched themselves at the cost of their prized colony. What happened once India became independent?
My new paper 鈥溾�� tries to answer this question for a particular historical phase in Indian history. Read More »
黑料社区 