Author: Nicholas Loubere

Nicholas Loubere is an Associate Senior Lecturer in the Study of Modern China at the Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University. He is the author of Development on loan: microcredit and marginalisation in rural China, forthcoming in 2019 with Amsterdam University Press.

The Curious Case of M-Pesa鈥檚 Miraculous Poverty Reduction Powers

Nicholas Loubere8 Comments
32893313893_6621b6cf98_o.jpg
M-PESA kiosk outside Kibera centre in Nairobi. Picture credit:

By ,听 and听Nicholas Loubere

Over the past decade the expansion of digital-financial inclusion through innovations in financial technology (fin-tech) has been identified by the World Bank, the G20, USAID, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and other major international institutions, as a key way to promote development and alleviate poverty in the Global South (; ; ). Perhaps the most influential and widely reported publication pushing forward this narrative is an article examining M-Pesa written by US-based economists Tavneet Suri and William Jack鈥�and published in the prestigious journal Science鈥�entitled ‘The Long-run Poverty and Gender Impacts of Mobile Money’. M-Pesa is a mobile phone, agent-assisted platform for transferring money from one person to another. It was originally developed with funding from DFID and has quickly become a darling of the digital-financial inclusion movement. In this particular article, the authors make the far-reaching claim that 鈥榓ccess to the Kenyan mobile money system M-PESA increased per capita consumption levels and lifted 194,000 households, or 2% of Kenyan households, out of poverty鈥� ().

Suri and Jack鈥檚 article in Science has sent ripples through the global development community and has served鈥�as perhaps was intended鈥�to solidify support for upping the promotion of digital-financial inclusion initiatives across the Global South. Importantly, the article鈥檚 claims of unprecedented poverty reduction have been uncritically picked up by all of the international development agencies and microcredit advocacy organisations, as well as by many mainstream economists, so-called 鈥榮ocial entrepreneurs鈥�, tech investors, and media outlets. Much like microcredit in the 1980s, fin-tech and digital-financial inclusion is now very widely seen as a 办别测鈥�if not the key鈥�to reducing global poverty and promoting local development.

In this post we summarise our recent article entitled 鈥業s Fin-tech the New Panacea for Poverty Alleviation and Local Development?鈥� (), which challenges Suri and Jack鈥檚 findings, and urges the global development community to take a second, more critical look at their study. We argue that the article contains a worrying number of omissions, errors, inconsistencies, and that it also employs flawed methodologies. Unfortunately, their inevitably flawed conclusions have served to legitimise and strengthen a false narrative of the role that fin-tech can play in poverty alleviation and development, with potentially devastating consequences for the global poor.Read More »