
The effectiveness of private equity has been a subject of ongoing debate in countries of the Global North. There is substantial evidence highlighting the extractive practices associated with private equity operations across Western nations. Examples include the decline of the and the financial instability of local councils in the UK, particularly in the provision of . Similarly, in the United States, private equity has been linked to the attrition of an already fragile . In ., its influence has contributed to the deterioration of care homes, raising significant concerns about its broader social and economic impact.
In a recent blog, Michael Roberts characterized private equity as 鈥溾, encapsulating the widely recognized critique that private equity firms function through a rentier model. These firms are frequently associated with practices such as asset stripping, worker lay-offs, and opting for excess leverage that increases the debt burdens of their acquisitions, all while failing to provide compelling evidence of value creation. This perspective aligns closely with earlier criticisms of private equity. During the 2000s, private equity operations were similarly likened to a swarm of , reflecting widespread disapproval of their extractive and often detrimental economic practices.
In summary, such analogies emphasize the aftermath of private equity operations, leaving behind 鈥渃arcasses and barren landscapes.鈥 Nevertheless, the evidence of a hollowed-out socio-economic landscape in the Global North has not deterred the international expansion of private equity into countries of the Global South. On the contrary, have emerged in tandem with the globalization of Western private equity. In so-called 鈥渆merging markets,鈥 this expansion manifests in various forms, including an enthusiasm for deploying 鈥渕oral money鈥 through international development initiatives.
This article examines the role of private equity in Global South countries, focusing on three key characteristics: the escalation of indebtedness, the weakening of public markets, and the public subsidy function of development finance in facilitating private equity investments.
Read More »