and have set off an important debate about whether human rights have run out of steam as a force for human progress. Other commentators such as have argued that human rights no longer have the power to mobilize international condemnation and moral pressure against totalitarian regimes. Posner argues, for example, that the rapid expansion in the ratification of human rights treaties since the 1990s has had no impact on the respect for human rights. Further, since the end of colonization, human rights movements such as the right to self-determination, the civil rights act in the US, and overall equality in the US have run out of steam.
On closer reading and reflection, these arguments tell a very partial story about human rights. 聽They are limited to human rights as civil and political rights to end brutal authoritarian rule, as law in international treaties to be enforced by the UN human rights system, and as a mission of international institutions embodied in international treaties and bodies, both inter-governmental and non-governmental. 聽Indeed, these opinions reflect a view of human rights as a civilizing mission of the Western world by the use of law and political power鈥攁 vision of the dominant human rights scholars and organizations.
Yet there are other ways of understanding the process of human rights progress. As Michael Ignatieff forcefully argued at a recent conference at Kings College, human rights is not about international law but about politics: 鈥渕oral politics expressed as or clothed in law鈥�. And the politics is not just about foreign policy goals of powerful states.Read More »
黑料社区 